Difference between revisions of "Anabaptistwiki talk:About"

Revision as of 04:18, 25 August 2009

Something should be added here concerning the licensing of the content (not that I think that it will be a problem, but it is good to be clear about it) I would propose the Creative Commons Share Alike with Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/[1]) Which allows others to reuse/modify the content as long as they also allow people to re-use/modify their content and provide a citation of the source. The benefit of using this license is that it would provide full compatibility with Wikipedea and allow other groups to take advantage of the content here and use it easily while still requiring citing this as a source.

The other license that comes to mind is the Creative Commons Non-Comercial Share Alike with Attribution http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/[2] Which is the same as above, but does not allow commercial uses. I do not know what the implications of this would be for interaction with Wikipedea

Revision as of 04:18, 25 August 2009 (view source) Jshaver (talk \| contribs) (New page: Something should be added here concerning the licensing of the content (not that I think that it will be a problem, but it is good to be clear about it) I would propose the Creative Common...)		Revision as of 04:18, 25 August 2009 (view source) Jshaver (talk \| contribs) Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Something should be added here concerning the licensing of the content (not that I think that it will be a problem, but it is good to be clear about it) I would propose the Creative Commons Share Alike with Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/]) Which allows others to reuse/modify the content as long as they also allow people to re-use/modify their content and provide a citation of the source. The benefit of using this license is that it would provide full compatibility with Wikipedea and allow other groups to take advantage of the content here and use it easily while still requiring citing this as a source.		Something should be added here concerning the licensing of the content (not that I think that it will be a problem, but it is good to be clear about it) I would propose the Creative Commons Share Alike with Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/]) Which allows others to reuse/modify the content as long as they also allow people to re-use/modify their content and provide a citation of the source. The benefit of using this license is that it would provide full compatibility with Wikipedea and allow other groups to take advantage of the content here and use it easily while still requiring citing this as a source.

−	The other license that comes to mind is the Creative Commons Non-Comercial Share Alike with Attribution http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/] Which is the same as above, but does not allow ~~comercial~~ uses. I do not know what the implications of this would be for interaction with Wikipedea	+	The other license that comes to mind is the Creative Commons Non-Comercial Share Alike with Attribution http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/] Which is the same as above, but does not allow commercial uses. I do not know what the implications of this would be for interaction with Wikipedea